Law
Latest
Law
Uncategorized
Terrible Things Done In The Name Of Roe
Roe v. Wade is often referenced by the state to justify controversial actions. These include state-imposed COVID mask mandates, the sterilization of disabled individuals, women, and inmates, as well as forced vaccinations. Roe, or the cases it cites, are used to support these measures in the name of public safety and health.
Read More
Latest
Law
Uncategorized
Roe Undemocratic
Legal scholars often view Roe v. Wade as undemocratic. They argue that in this case, the judicial branch imposed its own views rather than adhering to the perspectives of the elected branches. This decision is criticized for disregarding the will of the people.
Read More
Latest
Law
Uncategorized
You’re Fired!!
Whoever wins the US presidency will have the authority to dismiss anyone at their discretion, as established by the Seila Law LLC v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (2020) ruling. This grants an incredible amount of power.
Read More
Latest
Law
Uncategorized
Moody vs NetChoice: Navigating the Complexities of Speech, Discrimination, and Deplatforming
Moody vs NetChoice (2024) delves into the nuanced landscape of artificial intelligence and raises a fundamental question: who should be considered the speaker in the context of a deep-learning algorithm—the algorithm itself or the individual who crafted it? As this legal exploration unfolds, attention also turns to a preliminary injunction case, anticipating its likely deferral […]
Read More
Latest
Law
Uncategorized
Loving v. Virginia: Unraveling Controversies and Legal Paradigms
The landmark case of Loving v. Virginia, etched into the legal history of 1967, stands as a focal point of controversy and debate. Critics passionately argue that the court’s decision, viewed by some as antidemocratic, ignited discussions surrounding the perceived substitution of legislative processes with the court’s asserted wisdom. Drawing comparisons to Lochnerism, legal scholars […]
Read More
Latest
Law
Uncategorized
Desegregation Chronicles: The Supreme Court’s Dance of Can-Kicking and Optional Justice
Oh, the Supreme Court, that bastion of unshakable authority, took a real beating in those desegregation cases. Brown vs. Board of Education? Just a casual game of kicking the can back down to the lower courts. And of course, Boiling v Sharpe unveiled the shocking revelation that the 14th Amendment was apparently just a suggestion […]
Read More
Latest
Law
Uncategorized
The Long Struggle for Desegregation: From Evasion to Ongoing Oversight
In the turbulent history of desegregation, some Southern schools employed evasive tactics to resist integration. Rather than integrating, some schools transferred ownership to private companies, circumventing the 14th Amendment as private entities are not bound by its provisions. Shockingly, these companies explicitly prohibited black students, exemplifying the lengths some went to maintain segregation.
Read More
Latest
Law
Property Law
Reviews
Baker v. Wheeton
If you love someone, give them a future interest in fee simple in an estate. That being said, Baker v. Wheeton (1972) showed a husband did not love his wife.
Read More
Latest
Law
Property Law
Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.
When comes to how you can use your property, Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co. (1926) held that a zoning board can tell you how to use your property- or get out.
Read MoreFirst Amendment cases
Latest
Law
Reviews
Buckley v. Valeo
When it comes to spending money on politics, Buckley v. Valeo (1976) said campaign contributions are free speech.
Read More